Archive for March, 2010

Administrative Services Outsourcing (ASO) – A Flexible HR Service Option

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Human Resources OutsourcingOur last post discussed the concept of “Co-employment” and the role of a Professional Employer Organization. Today we will look at an alternative to co-employment – the ASO.

Administrative Services Outsourcing (ASO)

There has been a growing interest in offering non-PEO services in recent years. Known as ASO (Administrative Services Outsourcing), this service model offers clients a full range of human resources consulting, insurance administration and payroll services, without requiring the establishment of a co-employment relationship. An ASO relationship is also more commonly known as Human Resources Outsourcing.

Our firm began offering ASO services approximately five years ago, after our sales force experienced challenges to selling co-employment. In some cases, the reasons were tangible concerns, such as a risky blue collar operation with bad losses which was declined workers’ coverage through the PEO, or a small employer with minimum-wage employees that did not meet our minimum contribution levels for health insurance, or a long-term broker relationship which dashed the sales process.

In other cases, the objections were less tangible, but just as real. Prospects could not completely grasp the co-employment concept, felt they would be losing control over their employees, or simply looked at the PEO industry with suspicion. Insurance agents, fearful of losing a commission, didn’t help the sale either.

Recognizing the value proposition a PEO offers to small business, but fearful that the co-employment requirements could hinder sales, we adopted a more flexible, customized approach to selling human resource services. The philosophy was simple – if we already had the in-house experts available to provide a valuable service to a business, why should we force the PEO box – and possibly lose a deal – if the co-employment relationship did not work for a particular prospect?

Full service HR in a flexible environment

In an ASO relationship, clients can either maintain their existing benefits and workers’ compensation insurance plans, or the PEO shops their insurances on the open market. The win-win is obvious – clients maintain control of their own plans, and other concerns about co-employment can be avoided. At the same time, they still gain access to virtually all the PEO’s services. For the PEO, it can charge administration fees commensurate with the services provided, and maintain broader “golden handcuffs”.

The multi-service approach offers the PEO sales staff greater flexibility when consulting and packaging HR outsourcing services. It also promotes a more customer-centric sales approach, as the sales consultant can walk into a first sales call with no preconceived end-game or one-size-fits-all philosophy.

Particularly in today’s volatile economy, many small employers are hesitant to engage in complex, long-term financial arrangements. By its very nature, co-employment is a more involved relationship that is hard to enter, and even more difficult to break. The current economic climate is another reason ASO may be considered a more attractive option for a businesses looking for HR support.

Keep your HR options open

If you are considering using an outside service to assist you with your Human Resources management, take some time to investigate the benefits of both ASO and co-employment. Chances are, one of them will work for your organization, and  you’ll be on your way to simplifying your business operations, reducing your HR risks, and cutting employment overhead.

Co-Employment vs. ASO – Which HR Outsourcing Arrangement Makes Sense for Your Business?

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

HR OutsourcingIn the Professional Employer Organization (PEO) industry, there are typically two types of arrangements – Co-Employment, and ASO (Administrative Services Only). Both assist small and mid-size employers with their human resources tasks and responsibilities, but approach the relationship from two very different directions. Our next few posts will discuss the difference between these service-models and which one may make more sense for your business.

Co-Employment

Co-Employment is the relationship created between a PEO and its clients, wherein the PEO assists its clients in reducing the risks and responsibilities of being an employer. Co-Employment is defined as the contractual allocation and sharing of employer responsibilities between the PEO and the client. The PEO assumes the role of the Administrative Employer and is recognized as the legal Employer-of-Record. The PEO takes on numerous administrative, and strategic, functions for their clients. These functions include:

  • Paying the Employees and Filing Payroll Taxes
  • Issuing Workers’ Compensation Insurance Coverage
  • Providing Employee Health Insurance Coverages
  • Training Management and Staff
  • Implementing Risk Management and Safety Plans
  • Providing Employment Consulting and Compliance
  • Managing Administrative Human Resource Functions

The client maintains the role as the Administrative Employer and continues to manage and oversee all day-to-day activities relating to their internal operations. They provide worksite employees with the tools, instruments and place to work, and continue to oversee the hiring, firing, establishment of wages, and direction of the workforce. The PEO assists in ensuring that worksite employees are provided with a worksite that is safe, conducive to productivity, and operated in compliance with employment laws and regulations. In addition, the PEO provides worksite employees with workers’ compensation insurance, unemployment insurance, and a broad range of employee benefits programs.

Removing Distractions and Reducing Overhead

By providing these services, PEOs enable their clients to concentrate on their core business without the challenges and distractions associated with the “business of employment.” As a result, PEOs enhance the profitability of their client companies. The PEO’s economies-of-scale enables each client company to lower employment costs and increase the business’s bottom line. The client can maintain a simple in-house HR infrastructure or none at all by relying on the PEO. The client also can reduce hiring overhead. Costs related to the monitoring of, and compliance with, employment laws are reduced, as are the often significant costs of failure to comply with such laws. In addition, the PEO provides time savings by handling routine and redundant tasks for its clients. This enables the business owner to focus on the company’s core competency and grow its bottom line.

In our next post, we will discuss an alternative to co-employment, known as “ASO” – Administrative Services Only. Most of the same services, without creating a co-employment relationship.