Archive for June, 2010

How to Assess the Skill Level of Your Managerial Team – Part 2

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

In our last post, we discussed the critical role managers play in any organization. In this post we look at the process through which managers are assessed for their skill level, interest in their role, interpersonal skills and leadership capabilities. With this information, the executives will have a clear picture of their managerial team’s skills, and in which areas they may require improvement and development.

Where to Start

Have a Plan – Clearly Define the Position.  Before you go any farther assessing the skill levels of your leaders, you need to know what your standards are. We usually find these spelled out in a job description.  It gives us a point from which we can measure. What are your expectations from your supervisors and managers.  What do you hold them accountable for?  What skills are a necessity and what skills are a bonus? What is your definition of competent, how do you measure that? Be fair, specific and be realistic in your expectations.

Evaluate their Interest Level. Let’s also look at the interest level of your leaders.  Do they actually WANT to be a supervisor or manager?  There a specific qualities that exist in potential leaders.  Simply taking on additional responsibilities for additional pay is never going to be a strong enough motivator.  You need a person in a supervisory or managerial position who actually LIKES people, is patient and willing to take on the daily challenges that leading people brings to the table.

Match Skill Levels to the Plan. Then, match the skill level of the individual with your expectations.  We are defining two areas: are the skills in place at a level you want?  Are there skills that need to be added?

How To Assess

There are many ways to assess skill levels.  Often it takes an incident to trigger the assessment process. It forces us to pay attention to areas we may have been aware of, but chose to overlook for various reasons.  Usually we recognize a gap between how we expected a supervisor to handle a situation or conduct themselves and the reality of what actually occurred.  This identifies an initial area that needs our attention, but we should be careful to not approach this with a “Band-Aid” mentality.

An example: you have a supervisor who routinely fails to document employee performance issues, is this really a skills development need or simply a lack of awareness about a documentation policy?  Is the lack of documentation because they didn’t know they should or because they decided to not be bothered.  These are two very different issues. On the one hand, we would have a training to demonstrate how to document, why it is important and so forth.  On the other hand, if you have a supervisor who is ignoring policy, the assessment would point us in the direction of a need to change their behavior and understanding of what it means to be a leader representing the company. This might involve a one-on-one coaching or counseling.

Once you have identified the area that requires attention and we are as clear as possible about the underlying cause, and not just the surface issue that has brought it to our attention, we can then proceed with how we wish to implement the training and development process. This is routinely the process that all training and development general assessments go through.  First we define the area of need, focus on the underlying cause and then provide the proper training tool to address the issue.

Other Business Indicators

You don’t have to wait for an incident or problem to surface. There are many other ways to assess the skill levels of your managers and supervisors. A few of these can include:

•    Have sales figures dropped?
•    Has turnover increased?
•    What is the general attendance like?
•    What is the departmental error ratio?
•    Has performance of staff improved, stayed the same or declined?
•    Are customer complaints up, the same or down?

Aside from pulling reports, we can also gather information by being aware of our surroundings and observing our workplace. How are employees behaving?  Are their spirits up?  Is HR receiving a disproportionate number of complaints about certain areas or individuals?  Are employees courteous and cordial with each other or nervous and short-tempered?  Stress can also be a flag that we have a potential for harassment or inappropriate behavior, overbearing management or a general breakdown in the leadership.

When it comes to your observations it is extremely important to know the “pulse” of your workplace.  Surveys are also a great tool for taking the pulse of the work environment.  If individuals are assured of confidentiality, they will be frank.

In our third and final post in this series, we will examine the five methods to train and develop your managerial team.

Assessing the Skill of Your Management Team – Part 1 (What is a Manager?)

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Line supervisors and middle management are a key link between employees and senior management/owners. Employees perceive actions of management as intentions of company. Supervisors and managers are therefore a critical component in the working relationship we strive to achieve in the workplace between employees and owners.  Employees perceive what managers say or do as direct or indirect attitudes, ethics and belief systems of the company itself.

What is a Manager?

Who are these individuals that are such a vital link in the success of employee relations and the business?  From a legal standpoint, they are considered agents of the company.  We have seen this clearly demonstrated in harassment, discrimination and retaliation cases time and time gain.

Employees look to this level of leadership to effectively and fairly lead them, apply policies and procedures, and to ensure that senior management know the needs and thoughts of the employees.

However, managers are often the Achilles heel of most companies.  Lawyers know that managers not only supervise the staff, but are also the ones to implement, defend and apply the company policies. They are also the individuals who are heavily tasked with duties, other than managing staff. These individuals upon whom we so heavily rely may be new and freshly out of business school, employees who have been promoted into a supervisory or managerial position, or existing managerial level individuals we have brought in from outside.

Expectations

As time has gone by, we have come to expect more and more from our supervisors and managers.  We expect our supervisors and our managers to:

•    Legally interview and hire, knowing what is and is not legal to ask
•    Be gifted interviewers who know how to select the best candidates
•    Have all of the legal ducks in a row if termination becomes a necessity
•    Know the policies and procedures and make sure all staff are following the program
•    Know how to effectively motivate
•    Use progressive discipline as a tool to reengage staff
•    Conduct performance appraisals
•    Maintain the team balance
•    Solve problems and resolve conflicts
•    Know the laws regarding overtime, meal and rest breaks and enforce these laws
•    Be knowledgeable enough about the various leave of absence laws in the state and federal levels to notify Human Resources when a scenario may be unfolding.
•    Maintain an OSHA compliant work environment and hold employees accountable for safety standards
•    Maintain a safe, healthy work environment free from harassment, discrimination, and retaliation, serving as the ultimate ethical role model.

If we expect our supervisors and managers to succeed, we need to make sure that have the tools to succeed, that they are using their skills, and to be sure they want this role to begin with!

In our next post we will discuss the step-by-step process of assessing, and training, your managerial team.

DOL Interprets FMLA to Cover Same-Sex Parents

Friday, June 25th, 2010

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) on June 22, 2010, clarified the definition of “son and daughter” under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to ensure that an employee who assumes the role of caring for a child receives parental rights to family leave regardless of the legal or biological relationship. The DOL interpretation applies to non-traditional families, including unmarried partners and families in the lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender (LGBT) community.

The FMLA allows workers to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave during any 12-month period to care for a child, spouse or parent or for themselves. The law also lets employees take time off for the adoption or the birth of a child. The administrator interpretation issued by Nancy J. Leppink, deputy administrator of the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division, clarifies that these rights extend to the various parenting relationships that exist in today’s world.

The interpretation provides that “employees who have no biological or legal relationship with a child may nonetheless stand in loco parentis to the child and be entitled to FMLA leave.” It added that the fact that a child has both a mother and father would not prevent a finding that a child is the “son or daughter” of an employee who lacks a biological or legal relationship with the child. “Neither the statute nor the regulations restrict the number of parents a child may have under the FMLA,” Leppink wrote. “For example, where a child’s biological parents divorce, and each parent remarries, the child will be the ‘son or daughter’ of both the biological parents and the stepparents, and all four adults would have equal rights to take FMLA leave to care for the child.”

Leppink added that when an employer has questions about whether an employee’s relationship to a child is covered by the FMLA, the employer may require an employee to provide reasonable documentation or statement of the family relationship. “A simple statement asserting that the requisite family relationship exists is all that is needed in situations such as in loco parentis where there is no legal or biological relationship.”

“No one who loves and nurtures a child day in and day out should be unable to care for that child when he or she falls ill,” said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis in a statement. “No one who steps in to parent a child when that child’s biological parents are absent or incapacitated should be denied leave by an employer because he or she is not the legal guardian. No one who intends to raise a child should be denied the opportunity to be present when that child is born simply because the state or an employer fails to recognize his or her relationship with the biological parent. These are just a few of many possible scenarios. The Labor Department’s action today sends a clear message to workers and employers alike: All families, including LGBT families, are protected by the FMLA.”

As the interpretation makes clear, an uncle who is caring for his young niece and nephew when their single parent has been called to active military duty may exercise his right to family leave. Likewise, a grandmother who assumes responsibility for her sick grandchild when her own child is debilitated will be able to seek family and medical leave from her employer. And an employee who intends to share in the parenting of a child with his or her same-sex partner will be able to exercise the right to FMLA leave to bond with that child.

“This is a critical step in ensuring that children have the support and care they need from the persons who have assumed that responsibility,” Leppink said. “Nothing in the statute or regulations suggests that we should restrict the rights of various individuals who take on that very important role.”

Robin Shea, an attorney with Constangy, Brooks & Smith in Winston-Salem, N.C., said that the application of the FMLA to same-sex partners actings as parents “should be no surprise.” She said that the interpretation to some extent was “nothing more than a restatement of long-existing FMLA law.” But she said that “the DOL interpretation also says that a child can have an unlimited number of ‘parents’ for FMLA purposes, which arguably exceeds the spirit of the FMLA if not the letter.”

Source: Allen Smith, J.D., www.shrm.org

3 Tips to Stress-Free Recruiting

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Guest post by Angela Showell, CPEhr’s Recruiting Manager

The strengthening economy means more employers will be looking to hire new staff.  As the need to hire more employees increases, business owners may feel tense due to the lasting effects of the recession… a post traumatic stress of sorts. It leaves them feeling that the money being spent in new hire packages and compensation has yet to be earned and/or that they’re still in the red. Recruiters and hiring managers may feel a bit in the weeds also. Going from “not really busy” to “extremely busy” can be stressful, but the latter scenario is probably preferred – stress and all – considering the other option could be a trip to the unemployment line.

Three Stress-Free Tips

As CPEhr’s Recruiting Manager, my line of work includes performing the entire recruiting process for our clients.  However, during this period of such economic turmoil, many of them have taken to task their own recruiting efforts and the abundance of resumes is something that often overwhelms them.  When they call me for advice on how I handle the pressure from the volume, I provide the following three simple points:

  1. Change your perspective and don’t view the number of resumes as something intimidating.  Instead, try to consider it as a treat that there are so many capable candidates who are willing and want to work;
  2. Don’t try to look at the resumes as they come into your inbox.  The better approach is to receive the bulk of resumes (typically the first 2 weeks of the job posting) and set aside a block of time in which to go through them all and finally
  3. Make sure the job posting is in a reputable place, i.e., a site that was created specifically for employers looking for candidates and job seekers searching for employment.  With this approach, you’ll tend to receive more serious inquiries.

Another Way To Avoid Recruiting Stress – Outsource It!

Of course, if you prefer to avoid the stress of hiring altogether, CPEhr provides a complete Recruiting Service. Our unique, personalized approach to recruiting consists of more than 20 fundamental measures which allow us to focus on our candidates’ strengths as well as the needs of the position.

Our process includes:

  1. Fully understanding your company’s culture
  2. Developing the appropriate job description, title, and compensation range and
  3. Identifying, analyzing, and investigating candidates based on position requirements and, more importantly, personality traits and tendencies.

CPEhr offers its clients this premium, comprehensive recruiting service at deeply discounted rates, 50%-70% below standard market fees. We are so confident in our customized, modern and detailed approach to finding your next, best employee that we back it with a 90-day guarantee.

For more information contact our Recruiting Department at 877-842-4988, or email

7 Bad Habits of Highly Ineffective Managers

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

As the intermediary between the executives and staff, managers play a pivotal role in any organization. They are tasked with representing the company’s ethics and beliefs to their staff, leading and motivating their employees, and overseeing a wide range of administrative responsibilities. These tasks include interviewing and hiring staff, knowing wage and hour laws, conducting terminations, and resolving problems and conflicts. If we are going to be successful in supporting, developing and increasing the skill level of our managerial leaders, there are certain bad habits that need to be eliminated where ever possible

1. Don’t promote people to leadership simply because they are technically competent

Joe is a brilliant programmer who got promoted.  His new position requires that he manage a team of 12 people.  He is not interested in leading people, is generally a “work alone” type of personality, and only desired to do his job well.  He wonders why he is being punished and now finds himself in a job that is slowly killing him.

Solution:  Only promote people who have the technical knowledge AND the potential to lead.

2. Don’t promote people and then assume they know how to lead

You promote Susie to a leadership role and she is very excited, and also scared to death.  Why?  She has never led a team before and doesn’t know how.  It really isn’t that easy.  A leader needs to understand the styles and personalities of the team, tie all these diverse characteristics together into a viable team that understands and fulfills the department/team goals as well as company goals.  That’s a lot of responsibility.  Don’t be surprised if untrained individuals like Susie revert to modeling the negative behavior of her past managers—she has nothing else to go by.  It is not uncommon for newly appointed supervisors and leaders to gravitate to micromanagement.  Their necks are on the line, and they will take all necessary steps to ensure success.  They may be well meaning, but their lack of skills will drive employees away.

Solution:  Have a comprehensive leadership development training program in place to get new managers up to speed.

3. Don’t assume existing managers don’t need development

You may have hired a manager because they have the managerial skills in place (at least according to the resume and how they answered interview questions), but this does not mean that they are a great manager. If they aren’t a great manager, provide them developmental tools.  If they are a great manager, they are going to be interested in continually developing a increasing their knowledge base and skills.  A desire for ongoing learning is a characteristic of great leaders.

Solution:  All leaders should have an individual developmental plan and should receive training annually.

4. Don’t allow mean leaders to lead teams

Mean, surly, demanding, rude, offensive leaders…have we met these people before?  They lead through fear, not respect.  Why is this behavior tolerated?  Because they are great at their job? Because they get results?  Because they have been with the company a long time? These aren’t good reasons and these types of managers will cost you in the long run.  OSHA considers forms of bullying in the workplace as potential violence and there are 16 states considering legislation aimed at managers exhibiting exactly these types of behavior.

In such an environment, you can be certain that the staff they supervise are not performing at their full potential, and that there is underlying resentment and anger. There is a saying: “If you lead through fear, you will have no respect.  If you lead with respect you will have nothing to fear.”

If companies allow their managers to bully their staff, what message is that sending to the employees?  “We allow our managers to treat you like dirt but we still value you,”—yeah right!

Solution:  Provide tools that teach alternate methods of management and put them on notice.

5. Don’t allow executives to think that they don’t need development

How often do you hear, “We can go ahead with the training, but our VP won’t be attending”.  Why is this?  Why isn’t senior leadership interested in the new information and knowledge their direct reports are receiving?  Because attending the training might, a) intimidate the other middle management staff or, b) be considered an admission of incompetence.  Arrogance and ego may often rob senior level leadership of development they might need.

Solution: You can always separate levels of management for trainings, but encourage senior level to actively increase their knowledge base.

6. Don’t wait until you have a vacant leadership role to identify talent

When there is a vacancy at a leadership level the ensuing “plan” is often to fly by the seat of your pants.  There is a brief scramble to slam someone from the department into a temporary role and then hunt for qualified candidates.  Sometimes other managers are asked to take over positions—positions they don’t know anything about, over a team they are unfamiliar with, in addition to their own huge workload.

Solution: Create a contingency plan BEFORE a vacancy develops to prepare new potential managers for the role.

7. Don’t assume once is enough

Once may be enough in certain areas of training.  But understand that many of the areas in which we expect our leaders to be competent are often areas they may not routinely do.  As is true with all of us, one training will become stale and forgotten if not used frequently.  The knowledge we receive stays with us because of our use of that knowledge.

Solution: Plan for regular trainings at periodic intervals to ensure the skills remain sharp and fresh.

Hopefully, by developing strong managerial leaders, we will help develop a strong and vibrant organization.

Did You Know? 3 Common Payroll and Reimbursement Mistakes – Travel, Tips and Waiting Time.

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Below are three common employment scenarios that are often misunderstood which we would like to review:

1. Travel Expenses – Most states require employers to indemnify an employee for expenses incurred in the course of “discharging their duties” for their employers. This means that employers must reimburse for items such as mileage or reasonable travel expenses. The reimbursement is generally not taxable income, and can be paid through a company accounts payable department. Employers who reimburse employees for mileage at the IRS rate are deemed to have indemnified the employee for all expenses associated with using their car for work (gas, insurance, wear and tear, etc.). Therefore, we recommend employers adopt the IRS rate.

2. Tip Sharing – Occurs when a server shares the earned tips with “any employee who participates with the server in rendering some personal service to the patron.” Whether tip sharing is lawful and who may participate is determined by state law. Often, only those who are in the direct line of service may participate, and in other states, employees without direct service (e.g. cooks, dishwashers) may participate. Employers should carefully review their tip sharing practices, and determine if they are being applied in accordance with state law, as there have been many lawsuits regarding this issue recently.

3. Waiting Time – If an employee arrives to work, and is not put to work, but instead asked to wait until work is available, they are considered to be “under the control of the employer.” This means simply, they must be paid for the waiting time. If an employee is instead “on call”, where they are not required to report, and are free to engage in their own pursuits, but must be able to report within a certain time frame, they are generally not owed compensation.

If you have any questions regarding payroll, wages, IRS reimbursement or other employment-related issues, please do not hesitate to contact our Human Resources Consulting experts who will be happy to assist you.

Source: www.eplipro.com June 2010

Disclaimer