Archive for September, 2010

Progressive Discipline – The Final Steps of the Process

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

Our previous two posts discussed the informal and formal process of progressive discipline, concluding with the formal written warning. If these steps have still not caused the desired changes in the employee’s behavior, a Final Warning is the next step you should take if the employee does not improve.

Finally, if all steps in your policy have failed, it is the time to consider termination.  Some employees do not want to change, regardless of the opportunities presented to them.  If you have gone through the steps and documented them well, you have helped to protect yourself against a charge of wrongful discharge.

Some violations are so serious you may skip these prior steps. Stealing, drunkenness, or workplace violence are not acceptable behavior and may justify immediate termination. However, make sure you investigate first.  Sometimes situations are not what they appear.

Suspension

In general, suspension is not well received and does not achieve the goal of encouraging an employee to modify their behavior. It is an intimidation tool and most people resent attempts to intimidate them.  It tends to defeat the purpose of re-engaging and motivating an individual.  This is a form of punishment that is reminiscent of high school detention. It humiliates employees, excessively disciplines them through their pay check.

The Five Questions

As we have stated on many occasions, the ultimate protection against an employee lawsuit is complete and accurate documentation. Arbitrators and unemployment counselors always ask certain, very specific questions.  Therefore, every documentation, every warning, should always answer the following five questions:

  1. Did the employee clearly understand the rule or policy that was violated?
  2. Did the employee know in advance that such conduct would be subject to disciplinary action?
  3. Was the rule that was violated related to the safe, efficient and orderly operation of the organization?
  4. Is there substantial evidence that the employee did actually violate the rule?
  5. Is the planned disciplinary action reasonably related to:
  6. - The seriousness of the offense
    - The employee’s record with the organization?
    - Disciplinary action taken with other employees who have committed similar offenses?

How can you prove the answers to those 5 very important questions? Documentation.  It cannot be stated often enough how important the role of record keeping is when using a progressive discipline policy. If you don’t have a written warning form, get one. Always make sure the employee receives a copy. Be clear when telling the employee what rule was violated. Finally, all formal records should be kept in the employee’s personnel file for a predetermined period as defined by state and federal laws.

In Summary

The purpose of discipline is to put the responsibility for resolving the problem into the employee’s hands, while emphasizing the seriousness of the violation and providing proof of this effort through documentation.  The manager’s role is to encourage an employee’s self-discipline.  The only way this can effectively be accomplished is to inform what is expected of the employee and in both verbal and written form, give the employee the company’s rules, regulations, procedures and policies. Disciplinary action is a last resort to modify an individual’s behavior.

The 5 Steps of Progressive Discipline, Part 2: Beginning the Formal Process

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

In our last post, we reviewed the definition of Progressive Discipline, and the first, informal step in the process. Today, we move further down the process and take a look at the “formal” procedures.

Formal Verbal Warnings

If you have given one or two informal verbal warnings and there is no change in the employee’s behavior, the next step is to issue a formal verbal warning. Formal verbal warnings are the first official  step in progressive discipline.  These are always formally written up and go into an employee’s file.

Formal Written Warning

When the formal verbal warning has not been effective, the next step in progressive discipline is the formal written warning. This carries a more serious tone.

All written warnings must include the following information:

  1. The date
  2. Employee name
  3. Department
  4. Supervisor name
  5. Infraction
  6. Details of incident (including place, date and time)
  7. Names of witnesses
  8. Photocopies of evidence if needed

Getting a little more specific: Make sure you are clear about the employee’s infraction. A typical written warning notice form includes several boxes defining the violation.  Let’s say an employee is late and they are being verbally warned for attendance.  Check the attendance box.  Don’t also check the company policy box.  Even though attendance is a company policy, you are moving into overkill here and it sends an aggressive and hostile message.

Get the Facts

You need details to support the facts.  For instance, let’s take Ed who is chronically late.  While we have an issue of tardiness, we have no facts and no details supporting the facts. If you were handed a warning that simply stated Ed had been spoken to, what questions would you still have?  Remember these warnings are documentations that may be reviewed months (or in rare cases, even years) in the future.  It needs to be crystal clear no matter how old the warning is. Therefor, state a reason for the reprimand and give the employee a period for improvement.  Be sure to tell the employee what the consequences are for failing to improve. Consider if a stranger (or judge!) reads your message – would they clearly understand what is expected of the employee?  Would that stranger, reading your message, feel you were clear and factual, or that you were aggressive and hostile?

An additional benefit of being specific is that it is very important that the employee understand what is expected of them.  This gives them a goal and a clear definition of their responsibility.

Upon completing the written warning, there will be a place for employee comment which is also where an employee’s solutions would be noted, and both the supervisor and the employee should sign and date the document.  If the employee refuses to sign the warning, it should be noted and witnessed.

In our next and final post in this series, we will discuss what recourse you have as an employer if an employee has not responded positively to either Formal Verbal Warnings, or Written Warnings.

The Five Basic Steps of Progressive Discipline – Part I, the Informal Verbal Warning

Monday, September 20th, 2010

What is Progressive Discipline?

When a company hires an individual, there are expectations by both the employer and the employee: the employer expects that the employee will attend work regularly, arrive on time, perform as expected, respond positively to leadership, be respectful to co-workers and the clients, and obey the company’s policies and procedures.  In turn, the employee expects a safe working environment, fair employment practices, and reasonable, responsible leadership.

But what happens when an employee does not keep their end of the agreement?  What can employers do when employees don’t follow policies and procedures? The employer usually makes efforts to inform the employee of the infractions and guide them to modify the behavior. This is called Progressive Discipline.

Progressive discipline is defined as a method of documenting efforts to modify the behavior, and in more serious situations, impose discipline to emphasize the seriousness of the infraction.

Many businesses have found that when properly implemented, progressive discipline is an effective means of protecting against wrongful discharge claims.

The Four Basic Steps of Progressive Discipline

Typical progressive discipline systems follow four formal steps, often preceded by one “informal” one:

Informal:

Often employees are given “informal” verbal warnings before the formal process is applied.  Even “informal” warnings must be documented in a log to verify that event occurred.

Formal:

  1. Formal verbal warning
  2. Written Warning
  3. Written warning with disciplinary action
  4. Termination

Informal Warnings

Informal warnings are exactly that: an individual is verbally told to correct the behavior, but a “formal” verbal warning isn’t issued.  Informal warnings ARE ALWAYS DOCUMENTED, but do not go into the employee’s file as a formal notice. Understand that if it is not written down, it never happened. It is recommended that supervisors and managers keep notebooks to jot down conversations.  You won’t remember a conversation three days later and you should begin documenting from the first time you need to coach an employee.

When you coach or informally remind, jot down the date, time and the basic content of what was exchanged.  If the employee accepts the coaching and changes their behavior, the documentation can be discarded. If not, you now have started a fact support system if you need to move into the formal disciplinary action.

In our upcoming posts, we will dig deeper in the the next four, “formal” steps of the progressive discipline process.

The Cost-Cutting Benefits of Outsourcing Human Resources

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

There is no doubt that adding a few percentage points back into your bottom line would come in handy around now. Sales remain at record lows and employers are still hesitant to hire back lost staff until the economic indicators stop bouncing like a yo-yo. Many employers are looking for new ways to help contain costs and reduce overhead.

Reduce Employment-Related Expenses

While there are hundreds of corporate cost-cutting areas to consider, labor costs account for one of the largest operating expenses in a business. Beyond payroll and tax overhead, other expenses are related to health insurance premiums, workers’ compensation insurance, recruiting fees, payroll processing, and legal costs.

Human Resources Outsourcing and Professional Employer Organization firms pool thousands of employees under one roof and offer small and mid-sized business the economies-of-scale typically found within large corporations. Furthermore, by consolidating multiple vendors, companies can streamline operations and reduce overhead.

Companies that engage an HR Outsourcing relationship typically experience financial benefits in the following areas:

  • Workers’ Compensation insurance premiums
  • Health insurance costs
  • Employment Practices Liability Insurance
  • Legal fees
  • HR systems and infrastructure

Improved HR Efficiencies

In addition to hard cost savings, HR Outsourcing offers employers more efficient HR systems resulting in soft-cost savings. In place of current management, the HRO firm takes over some of the cumbersome administrative functions relating to employment. These activities, while necessary and often times critical, do nothing to add value to the company’s bottom-line. These functions can include:

  • Unemployment claims administration
  • COBRA management
  • Responding to employee inquiries
  • Employee health and benefits administration
  • Payroll administration
  • Tax filing and payments
  • Streamlining HR processes for the entire employee life-cycle

Consider HR Outsourcing for your business

While many employers are still wary of outsourcing business operations, they should recognize they are already engaged in many outsourcing relationships – payroll processing, accounting services, IT/tech support and legal are just a few examples of common outsourcing vendors. With HR administration and employment overhead absorbing such a large block of the time and costs of an organization, outsourcing Human Resources is the next logical relationship to consider. For more information, contact one of our HR Business Consultants.