Archive for December, 2010

Employment Legislation Recap – Looking Back at 2010

Thursday, December 30th, 2010

As 2010 comes to a close, we pause to reflect on one of the most active years in recent memory in regards to legislation impacting employers. Earlier this year, CPEhr’s General Counsel Joshua Sable, Esq. conducted a webinar covering many of these changes and how they will affect small businesses. The “2010 Employment Law Updates” webinar covered a wide range of HR topics, including the HIRE Act, Healthcare Reform, Disability Discrimination, Harassment Claims and many more. To hear the webinar in its entirety, please click HERE. Below are excerpts of some of the information presented by Mr. Sable:

HIRE Act.

On March 18, 2010, President Obama signed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act. The Act provides a wide range of incentives for employers including a tax holiday for hiring “new” workers and a tax credit for retaining such workers. The goal of the plan is to stimulate the economy and bring people back to work.

The key highlights of the “Tax Holiday” are:

* Relieves a “covered employer” of its obligation to pay its 6.2% match for Social Security on the first $106,800 of wages (potential savings of $6,622)
* Applies to those workers hired after 2/3/10 but before 1/1/11 on wages paid between 3/19/10 and 12/31/10

Health Care Reform.

Two bills were signed into law on March 23rd and 26th, 2010 – The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, respectively. Both laws have important consequences for employers and group health plans.

Effective 01/01/2014 employers with 200 or more full-time employees must automatically enroll new hires in health coverage. Employers with more than 50 full-time employees that do not offer coverage must pay a penalty of $166/month per employee (excluding first 30).

Disability Discrimination.

Recent California case law has changed the playing field, once again, in regards to disability discrimination. The two key updates are:

In the event an employee has been previously granted special accommodations for a disability, the employer has a continuing duty to inform new supervisors of these accommodations. Failure to do so can place the employer at risk of being sued.

Employers are required to actively identify and offer available positions to disabled employees – it is not sufficient to merely “allow” the disabled employee to apply for a new position.

Harassment Claims.

Attorneys have previously advised managers that “being a jerk” on the job, while impolite and unprofessional, does not violate the law, so long as the negative behavior was work related. However, a recent case made its way to the California Supreme Court (Roby v. McKesson) wherein an employee claimed her manager demonstrated particular hostility towards her, despite the fact that the behavior was in the context of job and performance criticism. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, stating the manager’s behavior created a hostile work environment. The clear message to managers: don’t be a jerk to your staff in the office!

If you have any questions about these, or any other HR related topics, do not hesitate to contact a CPEhr Human Resources Representative.

CPEhr Celebrates the Holidays with Donations to Its Non-Profit Clients

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010

In honor of the holidays, CPEhr will once again be making monetary donations to its non-profit organization clients.  Founded in 1982, CPEhr has been providing the California business community with human resources services for close to 30 years. The CPEhr management team celebrates the holidays by giving back to the community and its clients.

“We were seeking a unique way to express our appreciation to our clients,” said Faith Branvold, president of CPEhr. “We’re very fortunate to have their support, and we are constantly thinking of ways to thank them for their business.”

Recipients include:

  • ABC Recovery Center
  • Asian American Drug Abuse Program
  • City of Refuge Ministries
  • Etta Israel Center
  • Hadassah Southern California
  • Homes for Life Foundation
  • LINC Housing
  • Project New Hope
  • Step Up On Second
  • The Promises Foundation
  • United Cerebral Palsy Los Angeles
  • Viewpoints Research Institute
  • Westside Children’s Center

All of CPEhr’s for-profit clients received a holiday card featuring a list of the non-profit clients that received donations.

“Every year CPEhr and its employees are involved in charitable causes,” explained Branvold. “During the holiday season we allocate some of this charity with our own non-profits, and share the list with our other clients. This helps them learn about, and support, the non-profit organizations with which we have the pleasure of working.”

Important FICA Tax Information for 2011

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

President Barack Obama on Friday signed into law a bill extending Bush-era tax cuts and said he hoped the bill would help restore Americans’ faith in Washington.

One of the provisions states that every employee will benefit from a one year, 2% reduction in Social Security Taxes.  The rate for 2011 will decrease from 6.2% to 4.2% on the first $106,800 of taxable Social Security income.  This translates to the maximum tax decreasing from $6,621.60 to $4,485.60, a reduction of $2,136.00.  The Employer will continue to pay the rate of 6.2%.

If you have any questions regarding this new tax information, please contact CPEhr’s Director of Tax & Compliance Toby Kruger at 424.230.5602.

A Proactive Approach Can Help Reduce HR Risks in 2011

Friday, December 17th, 2010

In our last post, guest author Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D., reviewed some of the disturbing employment litigation trends we witnessed in 2010. In this follow-up post, Dr. Thomas provides suggestions to employers on how to remain proactive in 2011 and reduce the risk of being subjected to an employment related lawsuit.

Wage and Hour Compliance

To prepare for Wage and Hour compliance in 2011, employers should focus their initial compliance efforts on four main areas:

1.      Recordkeeping - review your recordkeeping practices to ensure you are keeping information about hours worked each day and each workweek, total daily or weekly straight-time and overtime earnings, and weekly regular hourly rate of pay.

2.      Exempt versus Non-Exempt Classification – proper classification is essential to compliance. If your employees are misclassified, it’s likely that you’re going to be out of compliance with other wage and hour laws for these employees.

3.      Determination of Hours Worked – ensure that on-call time, waiting time, travel time, setup time and all of the other time required or permitted is included in hours worked, as appropriate.

4.      Calculation of Overtime Pay – verify that your overtime calculations are based on the regular rate of pay, not the employee’s file rate of pay. This is one of the most common mistakes employers make.

Retaliation Claims

There are three simple steps employers can take to reduce their exposure to retaliation claims in 2011:

A. Adopt a stand-alone anti-retaliation policy that sets out the prohibition against retaliation and the procedures for redress. A stand-alone policy not only demonstrates that the employer is committed to non-retaliation, it can also be used as evidence in the event that an employee files a retaliation claim in the future.

B. Before an adverse employment action is taken against an employee who has participated in a “protected activity”, that action should be reviewed by appropriate management personnel and legal counsel. The reviewers should consider whether the proposed action is consistent with the employer’s typical practice and whether the action is supported by appropriate documentation.

C. Counsel and train managers and supervisors about retaliation, the organization’s anti-retaliation policy, and how to respond when a complaint is brought to their attention. The employer should also keep documentation on the training (e.g., who received training, what was covered, when the training took place, etc.).

While these three steps won’t guarantee that you’ll be free from retaliation claims, they will help to minimize the risk and can assist in your defense should you find yourself in retaliation litigation.

The Importance of Being Proactive

Based on the recent history of increasing employment litigation, employers should prepare for that trend to continue into 2011. We’re also likely to see more aggressive enforcement efforts from the Department of Labor. To meet this challenge, employers should engage in proactive analyses that assess and minimize the risk of employment-related litigation. These proactive analyses can identify potential problem areas and give the employer an opportunity to take corrective action, where appropriate. In my experience, many matters that resulted in litigation could have been prevented, had the employer performed some basic statistical analysis of its data with respect to equity.

Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D. can be reached via the Proactive Employer.

Disclaimer

Lessons from 2010 on Managing Employment Related Litigation in 2011

Monday, December 13th, 2010

Guest post by: Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.

In a previous guest post, I predicted an increase in employment litigation during 2010. As the year comes to a close, it’s time to look back and see if my prediction was correct.

According to Fulbright’s 7th Annual Litigation Trends Survey Report, 2010 did in fact see an increase in employment litigation:

FLSA / Wage and Hour Matters:   18% increase

Traditional Labor Union Matters:               11% increase

Age Discrimination:                                        10% increase

Race Discrimination:                                        7% increase

ERISA Matters:                                                  7% increase

Gender Discrimination:                                   6% increase

Disability Discrimination:                                6% increase

What were the major highlights of 2010, and how can employers prepare for 2011?

Wage and Hour Matters Still Pose Major Risk

For the past several years, there’s been a general increase in wage and hour disputes. That trend continued into 2010, with misclassification and overtime claims leading the way. In fact, wage and hour claims are the fastest growing type of employment litigation. Some experts have said that multi-plaintiff wage and hour lawsuits post the single greatest employment litigation threat to American businesses today. This may seem like an exaggeration. But when you consider that the Department of Labor estimates that approximately 70% of employers are routinely violating wage and hour laws, and the Wage and Hour Division recovered back wages of $1.4 billion for Fiscal Years 2001 through 2008, it seems a little more plausible.

Retaliation Claims Are On The Rise

Retaliation claims are also increasing; among all charges filed with the EEOC in 2009, 36% included a claim of retaliation. This represents an increase of 70% over the last decade. The 2010 statistics will be available in January 2011, and we’re expecting the trend in retaliation claims to continue.

It’s important to note that an employee can prevail on a claim of retaliation even if she doesn’t prevail on the underlying complaint of discrimination. Karen Gieselman, an attorney in the Columbia office of Fisher and Phillips, stated:

It’s easier for a juror to believe that a manager or supervisor changed his or her behavior towards a ‘squeal’, than it is for a juror to believe that the same manager or supervisor discriminated against the same employee.

Changes in the Regulatory Environment

The message of the Department of Labor’s Five Year Strategic Plan for the Fiscal Years 2011 Through 2016 is “good jobs for everyone”. Secretary Solis is making some changes at the agency to achieve that goal. Specifically, the Department of Labor will be changing its compliance efforts, and focusing those efforts on its worker protection agencies.

The Strategic Plan indicates that the burden of compliance will be shifting to the employer. This ties in to the Department of Labor’s Regulatory Agenda and the “Plan-Prevent-Protect” strategy.

The “Plan-Prevent-Protect” strategy centers around the idea that employers must “find and fix” violations and insure compliance before an investigator arrives at the workplace. The Department of Labor has stated that employers must understand that the burden is on them to obey the law, not on the Department of Labor to catch them violating the law.

Compliance in 2011

In our next post, Ms. Thomas reviews strategies that employers should consider to reduce their risk of litigation in 2011.

Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D. can be reached via the Proactive Employer.

Disclaimer

Two New Employment Laws Affecting California Employers in 2011

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

The California legislature has passed several bills which were signed into law and take effect January 1, 2011. The following two laws have a direct impact on employers, while others pertain to unemployment and other administrative matters.

Organ Donation Leave

California lawmakers have added a new leave entitlement for qualified private sector employees who volunteer to donate an organ or bone marrow. As an incentive to encourage people to save lives, the  legislature provides that employees who participate will receive generous leave rights, including paid time off. Eligible employees can take leaves of absence with pay for up to 30 days for organ donation or up to 5 days for bone marrow donation.

Employers may require use of vacation, sick and/or PTO under specific limitations. Under the new law, employees returning from organ or bone marrow donation leave must be returned to the same position they held when the leave began or to an equivalent position.

This leave will not run concurrently with FMLA or CFRA. The employer must continue paying for health benefits during the leave, and it does not constitute a break in service for purposes of seniority, vacation accrual, salary or other benefits of employment. Employers may not interfere with the leave or retaliate against an employee who takes leave.

Meal Period Exemption

AB 569 provides a limited exemption from California’s meal period requirement to construction employees, security officers in the security services industry, commercial truck drivers and employees of electrical and gas corporations and local publicly owned electric utilities if the employees are covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement which expressly provides meal periods for those employees.

If you are a California employer, we suggest you consult with a California human resources firm that is familiar with these news laws, and how they may impact your business.