Archive for the ‘Payroll and Tax’ Category

Did You Know? 3 Common Payroll and Reimbursement Mistakes – Travel, Tips and Waiting Time.

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Below are three common employment scenarios that are often misunderstood which we would like to review:

1. Travel Expenses – Most states require employers to indemnify an employee for expenses incurred in the course of “discharging their duties” for their employers. This means that employers must reimburse for items such as mileage or reasonable travel expenses. The reimbursement is generally not taxable income, and can be paid through a company accounts payable department. Employers who reimburse employees for mileage at the IRS rate are deemed to have indemnified the employee for all expenses associated with using their car for work (gas, insurance, wear and tear, etc.). Therefore, we recommend employers adopt the IRS rate.

2. Tip Sharing – Occurs when a server shares the earned tips with “any employee who participates with the server in rendering some personal service to the patron.” Whether tip sharing is lawful and who may participate is determined by state law. Often, only those who are in the direct line of service may participate, and in other states, employees without direct service (e.g. cooks, dishwashers) may participate. Employers should carefully review their tip sharing practices, and determine if they are being applied in accordance with state law, as there have been many lawsuits regarding this issue recently.

3. Waiting Time – If an employee arrives to work, and is not put to work, but instead asked to wait until work is available, they are considered to be “under the control of the employer.” This means simply, they must be paid for the waiting time. If an employee is instead “on call”, where they are not required to report, and are free to engage in their own pursuits, but must be able to report within a certain time frame, they are generally not owed compensation.

If you have any questions regarding payroll, wages, IRS reimbursement or other employment-related issues, please do not hesitate to contact our Human Resources Consulting experts who will be happy to assist you.

Source: www.eplipro.com June 2010

Disclaimer

2010 Employment Laws Update – Webinar Recap

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Last month, Joshua Sable, Esq., CPEhr’s in-house General Counsel, conducted a webinar covering important changes to labor laws affecting small businesses. The “2010 Employment Law Updates” webinar covered a wide range of HR topics, including the HIRE Act, health care reform, disability discrimination, harassment claims, arbitration agreements, spying on employees, and trade secret protection.

Key points of various topics appear below. To hear the complete presentation, follow this LINK.

The HIRE Act.

The Act provides a wide range of incentives for employers including a tax holiday for hiring “new” workers and a tax credit for retaining such workers. The goal of the plan is to stimulate the economy and bring people back to work.

The key highlights of the “Tax Holiday” are:

•    Relieves a “covered employer” of its obligation to pay its 6.2% match for Social Security on the first $106,800 of wages (potential savings of $6,622)
•    Applies to those workers hired after 2/3/10 but before 1/1/11 on wages paid between 3/19/10 and 12/31/10

Health Care Reform.

Two bills were signed into law on March 23rd and 26th, 2010 – The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, respectively. Both laws have important consequences for employers and group health plans.

Effective 01/01/2014 employers with 200 or more fulltime employees must automatically enroll new hires in health coverage. Employers with more than 50 fulltime employees that do not offer coverage must pay a penalty of $166/month per employee (excluding first 30).

Disability Discrimination.

Recent California case law has changed the playing field, once again, in regards to disability discrimination. The two key updates are:
1.    In the event an employee has been previously granted special accommodations for a disability, the employer has a continuing duty to inform new supervisors of these accommodations. Failure to do so can place the employer at risk of being sued.
2.    Employers are required to actively identify and offer available positions to disabled employees – it is not sufficient to merely “allow” the disabled employee to apply for a new position.

Harassment Claims.

Attorneys have previously advised managers that “being a jerk” on the job, while impolite and unprofessional, does not violate the law, so long as the negative behavior was work related. However, a recent case made its way to the California Supreme Court (Roby v. McKesson) wherein an employee claimed her manager demonstrated particular hostility towards her, despite the fact that the behavior was in the context of job and performance criticism. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, stating the manager’s behavior created a hostile work environment. The clear message to managers: don’t be a jerk to your staff in the office!

Additional topics covered included defending discrimination cases, arbitration agreements, spying on employees at work, protecting business trade secrets, and non-solicitation of employees and customers.

Once again, if you missed the presentation, we highly encourage you to hear it at your convenience. It can be downloaded HERE.

If you have any questions about these, or any other HR related topics, do not hesitate to contact a CPEhr Human Resources Outsoucing Representative.

Employee or Independent Contractor – Would Your Company Pass an IRS Audit?

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), the IRS claims to lose millions of dollars in uncollected taxes each year due to independent contractor misclassification by employers. As such, as part of a national research project on employment taxes, the IRS is scheduled to audit 6,000 randomly selected companies ranging from large to small firms and even non-profits. The goal of the program, which is scheduled to last from 2010 to 2012, is to create a scoring system for employment taxes. The audit will focus on the following items: failure to file, fringe benefit issues, executive compensation (including stock options) and employees misclassified as independent contractors.

The IRS sets forth clear eligibility guidelines for what determines independent contractor status. The following is taken directly from the IRS website:

Common Law Rules

In determining whether the person providing service is an employee or an independent contractor, all information that provides evidence of the degree of control and independence must be considered.

Facts that provide evidence of the degree of control and independence fall into three categories:

  1. Behavioral: Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?
  2. Financial: Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the payer? (these include things like how worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, who provides tools/supplies, etc.)
  3. Type of Relationship: Are there written contracts or employee type benefits (i.e. pension plan, insurance, vacation pay, etc.)? Will the relationship continue and is the work performed a key aspect of the business?

Understanding the Implications of Misclassification.

Employers should understand the implications of misclassifying employees as independent contractors.  Employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors may find themselves responsible for employment taxes and penalties, as well for various benefits that the misclassified employee may be eligible for such as health insurance, pension, vacation and sick benefits, worker compensation, unemployment, etc.  It is important for employers to review their 1099s, identify independent contractors who may be misclassified and reclassify them appropriately.

The “Twenty Factor Test”

Perhaps the most famous determinant of independent contractor status is the IRS’s 20 Factor Test. The IRS created the test as a tool to help employers identify if their worker is an independent contractor or employee. Although, a worker does not necessarily have to meet all 20 factors to be considered either an employee or an independent contractor, it is important to view the circumstances of each individual case. You can download a copy of the 20 Factor Test here.

For more information on independent contractor classifications, please contact CPEhr for a complimentary qualification consultation.

Thi Ha, HR Account Manager at CPEhr, contributed to this post.

Disclaimer

Government Announces Plans to Crackdown on Illegal Independent Contractor Usage

Monday, December 7th, 2009

If you are like most employers, the chances are you use Independent Contractors. Employers engage the services of Independent Contractors (IC’s) instead of employees for numerous reasons. Mostly, to save money on a range of employment costs, such as:

  • federal and state tax,
  • workers compensation insurance,
  • unemployment insurance,
  • employee benefits,
  • overtime, vacation and sick pay.

However, now more than ever, employers must be aware that federal and state lawmakers are beginning to crack down on employers who hire ICs that do not meet the strict IRS requirements.

What are the guidelines to be an Independent Contractor?

The following are excerpts from the IRS website, Section 762 – Independent Contractor vs. Employee:

  • Behavioral Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control how the work is done through instructions, training, or other means.
  • Financial Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control the financial and business aspects of the worker’s job. This includes:
  1. The extent to which the worker has unreimbursed business expenses
  2. The extent of the worker’s investment in the facilities used in performing services
  3. The extent to which the worker makes his or her services available to the relevant market
  4. How the business pays the worker, and
  5. The extent to which the worker can realize a profit or incur a loss
  • Type of Relationship covers facts that show how the parties perceive their relationship. This includes:
  • Written contracts describing the relationship the parties intended to create
  • The extent to which the worker is available to perform services for other, similar businesses
  • Whether the business provides the worker with employee–type benefits, such as insurance, a pension plan, vacation pay, or sick pay
  • The permanency of the relationship, and
  • The extent to which services performed by the worker are a key aspect of the regular business of the company

Government crack-down

As the government is looking for ways to bring in revenue in a down-economy, they are paying serious attention to the losses incurred by the usage of ICs. Reports estimate the misuse of ICs lowers income tax revenues by about $4.7 billion annually. In Illinois, for example, the  University of Missouri–Kansas City Department of Economics estimates that from 2001 through 2005, the state lost $124.7 million PER YEAR year in income taxes as a result of IC misclassification by employers.

In August, Congress began reviewing several bills that tighten restrictions on the use of ICs and exact tougher penalties on employers who bend the rules. The IRS also announced plans to randomly audit six thousand businesses nationwide to curb abuse.

Don’t take shortcuts

If your company engages the use of ICs, don’t let the lure of bypassing a few tax and insurance dollars distract you from the real-life risks at hand. You should take the time to seriously review your IC relationships and determine if they do, in fact, match the IRS guidelines. If you are uncertain where to begin, there are professional human resource outsourcing and consulting firms that specialize in these employment relationships and can guide you to make the right decision for your company.

Wage and Hour Laws Part 2 – How to Calculate Bonuses

Monday, October 19th, 2009

In our last post we reviewed some of the basic guidelines relating to wage and hour compliance, and how California law differs from Federal law. In this post we continue to review wage and hour laws, but move to bonuses.

Discretionary and Non-Discretionary Bonuses

Employers usually pay two types of bonuses: non-discretionary and discretionary.

Discretionary bonuses are usually paid as a gift for past services and are not measurable by an employee’s work performance, and/or hours worked.  An example of a discretionary bonus is a holiday bonus or special occasion bonus.

Non-discretionary bonuses are bonuses that are intended to increase an employee’s performance and efforts.  For example, bonuses paid on work performance efficiency and quality, attendance, years of service, and bonuses promised to employees at time of hire are considered non-discretionary.

When paying out non-discretionary bonuses, you must also pay the overtime “premium” on the bonus.  According to the Department of Labor, since the bonus was earned during the regular hours as well as the overtime hours, the overtime “premium” on the bonus is paid on half-time or full-time (for double time hours) on the regular bonus rate (from DLSE Manual). Unfortunately, you cannot just pay an employee a $100 bonus, if they worked any overtime in the pay period for which the bonus was earned.  You must reference the bonus on their pay stubs and note the workweek(s) that the bonus was earned.

Example On How to Calculate Overtime Premium When a Bonus is Paid:

Regular hourly rate of pay………………………………………………………………………………………..$10.00

Overtime rate of pay………………………………………………………………………………………………..$15.00

Total hours worked in workweek = 50

Total regular hours worked= 40 (8 hours x 5 days)

Total overtime hours at time and one-half = 10 (2 hours x 5 days)

Bonus………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………$100.00

Regular bonus rate:

$100.00 (bonus) ÷ 50 (total hours worked) =

$2 .00 ÷ 2 (for half of the regular rate) =

$1.00 x 10 (Overtime Hours) = $ 10.00

Total earnings due for the workweek:

Regular hours: 40 hours @ $10.00 ………………………………$400.00

Overtime: 10 hours @ $15.00 ……………………………………..$150.00

Bonus ……………………………………………………………………………$100.00

Overtime on bonus…………………………………………………………$ 10.00

Total ……………………………………………………………………………$660.00

Remember, wage and hour laws vary by state, it is important that you understand that as an employer you are mandated by law to pay your employees for all hours worked.

The Bottom Line

Confused yet?? There is a lot to know, and a lot to implement. If you are concerned about tackling wage and hour compliance alone, you may want to consider outsourcing some of these complicated laws to professionals who can guide you every step of the way. Please contact us for a free wage and hour consultation.

Contributed by: Thi Ha and Monique Stennis, CPEhr

Wage and Hour Compliance for Small Employers – What You Need To Know

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

Companies both large and small are finding themselves in legal battles against employees for not complying with overtime laws as outlined in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA). The complex regulations found in the FLSA code governing proper payment of wages is overseen by the Department of Labor and can result in hefty fines, or possibly prison time, for multiple violations. In this and subsequent posts, we will look at some of the potential pitfalls, guidelines and laws governing wages as outlined in the FLSA.

The Department of Labor states the following on their website:

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes standards for minimum wages, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor. These standards affect more than 100 million workers, both full‑time and part‑time, in the private and public sectors.

The Department of Labor uses a variety of remedies to enforce compliance with the Act’s requirements. When Wage and Hour Division investigators encounter violations, they recommend changes in employment practices to bring the employer into compliance, and they request the payment of any back wages due to employees.

Willful violators may be prosecuted criminally and fined up to $10,000. A second conviction may result in imprisonment. Employers who willfully or repeatedly violate the minimum wage or overtime pay requirements are subject to civil money penalties of up to $1,100 per violation.

Recent Lawsuits

A New Jersey federal court jury unanimously awarded $2.5 million to Staples, Inc. employees in a class-action lawsuit for failing to comply with the laws that require the correct classification of employees (e.g. exempt or non-exempt) and paying for overtime wages. In another case, Valero Energy Corp. is currently involved in a class-action lawsuit that seeks $100 million in damages. The suit, brought on by three current employees, alleges that Valero required employees to work overtime hours “off the clock” without compensation.

As an employer, it is important that all wage and hour laws are adhered to, including payment of overtime and the pay-out of bonuses.

Understanding California Overtime Hours

While the Federal standards of the Act are complicated enough, California employers must adhere to a different set of guidelines. Most fundamentally, California requires that all hours worked in excess of eight (8) regular hours in one workday or forty (40) regular hours in one workweek will be treated as overtime. Non-exempt hourly employees are compensated as follows for working overtime:

  • Time and a half the regular rate of pay for hours worked beyond eight (8) in a workday;
  • Double the regular rate of pay for hours worked beyond twelve (12) in a workday;
  • Time and a half the regular rate of pay for the first eight (8) hours worked on the seventh consecutive workday in a workweek;
  • Double the regular rate of pay for hours worked beyond eight (8) on the seventh consecutive day worked in a workweek;

Time and a half the regular rate of pay for hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek. There is no “pyramiding,” which means you will not be paid overtime twice for the same hours of work.

Outsourcing Solutions

Considering the complex laws and potentially expensive implications of non-compliance, many employers have elected to outsource the management of their FLSA compliance to outside experts who specialize in these laws. Human Resources specialists recognize violations and can offer immediate solutions to remedy them. Additionally, most small business owners are unable to remain abreast of developing laws and changing regulations. In contrast, Human Resources Outsourcing firms are constantly on the lookout for new laws that my impact their clients, and can quickly implement them. We encourage you to investigate the benefits of outsourcing your payroll and wage compliance to an HR Outsourcing firm familiar with the laws in your state. Contact us for more information.

In our upcoming posts, we will examine how overtime laws impact Bonuses and how to calculate overtime pay based on a sample workweek.

Contributed by: Thi Ha and Monique Stennis, CPEhr