Posts Tagged ‘employment compliance’

“The onslaught of wage and hour litigation continues unabated” – how will you protect yourself?

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

As companies continue to find their footing in this slippery and unpredictable economy, you shouldn’t lose sight of the importance of solid HR practices in your company. Despite the desire to cut costs – and perhaps cut corners – solid HR is critical in protecting your company against lawsuits, and in weathering the economic storm. We ask our prospects the following five questions when considering, How does their HR bottom line look?

  1. Is your employee handbook up-to-date?
  2. Do your managers understand and comply with progressive discipline practices?
  3. Do you have detailed job descriptions to hold employees to objective standards?
  4. Do your Human Resources practices reduce your liabilities as an employer?
  5. Are you prepared to adapt to changes in Human Resources/Benefits regulations?

If you answered No, or I’m Not Sure, to any of the questions above, you may be placing your company in jeopardy. Recent reports support the tale that during an economic downturn, employment lawsuits rise. A recent overview of the legal landscape by The Legal 500, a 20-year old publication providing comprehensive worldwide coverage on legal services providers, confirmed this fact:

The onslaught of wage and hour litigation continues unabated, although the focus has now turned to cases of greater complexity or those relating to specific industries such as pharmaceuticals or construction. The other main development in this area is the increase in litigation resulting from widespread reductions in force. As the hostile economic climate of 2009 forced workers to scrutinize the reasons for their termination in more detail it made them more likely to pursue claims of wrongful termination when they couldn’t secure employment elsewhere. Along with these trends, new legislation continues to fuel changes in the employment landscape.

What are you doing to protect yourself?

In our next post, we will discuss two cost-effective ways employers can protect themselves from the ever-growing tide of employment lawsuits.

Will Your Company Be the Next Million-Dollar Wage & Hour Lawsuit?

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Just about every day, it seems the Department of Labor wins or settles another expensive lawsuit based on the “simple” laws of wage and hour. Below are eight beyond-the-basics FLSA questions that address wage and hour questions. How knowledgeable are you?

1. Q. Can we give an extra week of vacation to cover any overtime?
A. Providing vacation rather than overtime is not legal under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

2. Q. Do general standards exist for exempt employees who do work beyond the normal workweek? For example, if they travel during the weekend for work, is it expected that they would get a day off later in compensation?
A. It is not expected that an exempt employee receive a day off after working on a weekend. Exempt employees are expected to work when duty calls.

3. Q. Can an employer deduct paid benefit leave, such as sick leave or personal leave, in half-day increments from an exempt employee if it is a written company policy?
A. You can deduct less than a day’s time from an exempt employee’s allotted sick time, vacation time, or personal time. You cannot deduct from an exempt employee’s paycheck for less than a day’s absence for sickness, disability, or personal leave.

4. Q. If an exempt employee calls in sick for a whole day and doesn’t have any accrued sick time on the books, can we dock his or her pay for the day?
A. Yes, as long as the deduction is made in accordance with a bona fide plan, policy, or practice of providing compensation for loss of salary caused by this type of sickness or disability. Remember, though, that you cannot deduct for less than 1 day’s absence.

5. Q. If an employee is exempt, can you still choose to classify him or her as nonexempt and pay him or her hourly with overtime?
Yes. You can classify any employee as hourly and pay the employee overtime, even employees who could otherwise pass the exemption tests.

6. Q. How do you distribute overtime among employees?
A. Distribution of overtime is a constant source of controversy in industry, both union and nonunion. Whether overtime is considered desirable because of the premium pay or undesirable because of the loss of free time, employees of similar skill should have equal opportunity or equal burden for overtime assignments.

A practical method is for the department supervisor to maintain a roster recording each employee’s overtime work. A properly kept roster will prevent unfair distribution of overtime and will help settle disputes. Ordinarily, in maintaining a roster, an employee who declines overtime is charged with a “time at bat,” and his or her name goes to the bottom of the roster.

7. Q. Our workweek is 35 hours, plus we pay lunch breaks of 1 hour each day, totaling 40 hours paid. If our employees work 36 hours and are paid for 41, is that extra hour considered overtime, or can we pay them straight time?
A. You can pay them straight time. The FLSA requires that overtime be paid for each hour worked in excess of 40 hours in a week. Since the lunch breaks are not “hours worked,” they don’t have to be counted toward overtime. Therefore, each employee’s total hours worked in that week would be only 36.

8. Q. All of our employees participate in a day of volunteering. Do we have to pay them on this day?
Charitable work performed at the employer’s request as part of the job or during work hours is considered hours worked. Charitable work will not be considered hours worked if:

  1. It is completely voluntary (even if the program is sponsored by the employer).
  2. It is performed outside of work hours.

If employees get the impression that their jobs would be in jeopardy or that they would receive fewer perks for failing to contribute to charity work, a court could say that the hours were not voluntary, but were coerced. This time could then be considered hours worked. In addition, employees cannot perform volunteer work for an organization that employs them if the work is similar to that for which they are paid.

(Source: The HR Daily Advisor, www.blr.com)

Disclaimer

2010 Employment Laws Update – Webinar Recap

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Last month, Joshua Sable, Esq., CPEhr’s in-house General Counsel, conducted a webinar covering important changes to labor laws affecting small businesses. The “2010 Employment Law Updates” webinar covered a wide range of HR topics, including the HIRE Act, health care reform, disability discrimination, harassment claims, arbitration agreements, spying on employees, and trade secret protection.

Key points of various topics appear below. To hear the complete presentation, follow this LINK.

The HIRE Act.

The Act provides a wide range of incentives for employers including a tax holiday for hiring “new” workers and a tax credit for retaining such workers. The goal of the plan is to stimulate the economy and bring people back to work.

The key highlights of the “Tax Holiday” are:

•    Relieves a “covered employer” of its obligation to pay its 6.2% match for Social Security on the first $106,800 of wages (potential savings of $6,622)
•    Applies to those workers hired after 2/3/10 but before 1/1/11 on wages paid between 3/19/10 and 12/31/10

Health Care Reform.

Two bills were signed into law on March 23rd and 26th, 2010 – The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, respectively. Both laws have important consequences for employers and group health plans.

Effective 01/01/2014 employers with 200 or more fulltime employees must automatically enroll new hires in health coverage. Employers with more than 50 fulltime employees that do not offer coverage must pay a penalty of $166/month per employee (excluding first 30).

Disability Discrimination.

Recent California case law has changed the playing field, once again, in regards to disability discrimination. The two key updates are:
1.    In the event an employee has been previously granted special accommodations for a disability, the employer has a continuing duty to inform new supervisors of these accommodations. Failure to do so can place the employer at risk of being sued.
2.    Employers are required to actively identify and offer available positions to disabled employees – it is not sufficient to merely “allow” the disabled employee to apply for a new position.

Harassment Claims.

Attorneys have previously advised managers that “being a jerk” on the job, while impolite and unprofessional, does not violate the law, so long as the negative behavior was work related. However, a recent case made its way to the California Supreme Court (Roby v. McKesson) wherein an employee claimed her manager demonstrated particular hostility towards her, despite the fact that the behavior was in the context of job and performance criticism. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, stating the manager’s behavior created a hostile work environment. The clear message to managers: don’t be a jerk to your staff in the office!

Additional topics covered included defending discrimination cases, arbitration agreements, spying on employees at work, protecting business trade secrets, and non-solicitation of employees and customers.

Once again, if you missed the presentation, we highly encourage you to hear it at your convenience. It can be downloaded HERE.

If you have any questions about these, or any other HR related topics, do not hesitate to contact a CPEhr Human Resources Outsoucing Representative.

Six Factors to Determine If An Intern Must Be Paid

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

As the summer approaches, you may be considering using interns within your organization. Interns are not only an inexpensive source of labor, but they can provide valuable insights or bring new ideas to your company. It is estimated that 15%-20% of companies use interns on a regular basis. [1]

Most Interns Must Be Paid

Did you know, however, that most internships must be paid? Internships have recently become a focus of audits for the U.S. Department of Labor. The DOL has issued a fact sheet on internships describing the criteria which must be met for it to be unpaid. An internship can be unpaid only if it is training solely for the educational benefit of the intern.

The determination of whether an internship or training program meets this narrow exception depends upon all of the facts and circumstances of each situation. Below are the criteria which must be applied when making the determination as to whether an internship is for the educational benefit of the intern:

  1. The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the facilities of the employer, is similar to training which would be given in an educational environment;
  2. The internship experience is for the benefit of the intern;
  3. The intern does not displace regular employees, but works under close supervision of existing staff;
  4. The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern; and on occasion, its operations may actually be impeded;
  5. The intern is not necessarily entitled to a job at the conclusion of the internship;
  6. The employer and the intern understand that the intern is not entitled to wages for the time spent in the internship.

Companies are still free to have interns, but if the internship does not meet these criteria, the intern must be paid at least minimum wage. If you are considering utilizing interns in your company, please contact an HR Consultant today to assist you with the process.

[1] Financial Planning Association Survey 2006

Source: EPLI Pro News, May 2010

Proactive Measures Employers Should Take to Protect Themselves Against the DOL

Monday, May 17th, 2010

In our last post, guest author Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D., discussed the Department of Labor’s new ‘We Can Help’ campaign. In this post, she examines some of the proactive steps employers should take to protect themselves.

Take Proactive Measures Now

The Department of Labor’s ‘We Can Help’ campaign highlights the importance of taking a proactive stance and meeting this challenge head-on. It is more important than ever for employers to review their classification of employees, pay practices and compensation document creation and retention policies. Employers, in conjunction with legal counsel, should perform self-audits to identify any potential problem areas, and take corrective action where required. It’s important to involve legal counsel in the self-auditing process at its inception. There are a variety of privilege issues that need to be addressed, and legal counsel is best positioned to advise employers on these issues to protect both the employer and the employees.

Key areas employers should be examining include:

•    Misclassification of employees as exempt
•    Misclassification of employees as independent contractors
•    Failure to pay otherwise exempt employees on a salary basis
•    ”Off the clock” work
•    Proper calculation of the regular rate of pay
•    Donning and doffing activities
•    Unpaid on-duty meal breaks
•    Miscalculated commissions and bonuses

The U.S. Department of Labor has estimated that approximately 80% of employers are not in compliance with applicable wage and hour laws. The risk of being targeted for a wage and hour lawsuit is now greater than ever. Wage and hour litigation is expected to remain a source of significant exposure to employers well into the future. The old adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” couldn’t be more appropriate. Don’t wait for a lawsuit or an investigation – take action now.

CPEhr Offers DOL Compliance Services

“Take action now” is perhaps easier said than done. Where to begin? With whom to consult? CPEhr’s Human Resources Consulting services offer a turn-key HR compliance system, that will walk you through every step of the process.  From job descriptions and classifications, to payroll worksheet audits and review, CPEhr’s compliance team will help protect you against a DOL audit, and will work vigilantly to remove a claim, should one arise. Contact CPEhr today for more information.

(This guest post was authored by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D. the Director of the Equal Employment Advisory and Litigation Support (EEA/LS) Division of Minimax Consulting. Her division specializes in the application of economics and statistic to employment decisions and employment related issues. Stephanie can be reached at http://www.theproactiveemployer.com.)

Disclaimer

Increased DOL Enforcement Calls for Proactive Measures

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Guest post by: Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.

When Hilda Solis was sworn in as Secretary of Labor in March of 2009, she reiterated her goal that workers receive fair treatment, a safe and healthy workplace, and receive the wage they deserve. She stated:

“To those who have for too long abused workers, put them in harm’s way, denied them fair pay, let me be clear – there is a new sheriff in town.”

A New Sheriff In Town

There has definitely been a change in attitude at the Department of Labor. They are taking a far more aggressive stance, increasing enforcement efforts, prosecuting more aggressively, and seeking larger recoveries from employers. The Department of Labor has received a significant amount of funding in its Fiscal Year 2010 budget, and is requesting even more in its proposed Fiscal Year 2011 budget. According to Secretary Solis, the majority of this funding will be used to hire new investigators. These investigators are in addition to the hiring of 250 wage and hour investigators announced by Secretary Solis on November 19, 2009. In her March 10, 2010 testimony before the Congress, Secretary Solis stated that the Department of Labor “intend[s] to reduce the prevalence of misclassification and secure the protections and benefits of the laws we enforce.”

‘We Can Help’

In April of 2010, Secretary Solis announced the national “We Can Help” campaign, a public awareness campaign aimed at informing workers about their rights. The campaign includes a new website providing information on how to file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division, and encourages employees to provide copies of pay stubs, hours of work, and other information related to the employer’s pay practices.

At the campaign launch, Secretary Solis reaffirmed her commitment to helping the nation’s low-wage and vulnerable workers:

“I’m here to tell you that your president, your secretary of labor and this department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her rightful pay – especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard, and often dangerous hours… We can help, and we will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our laws. And you can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those protections work for you.”

Experts are predicting a surge in wage and hour enforcement efforts. I have spoken with several employment attorneys, and all of them have indicated that wage and hour issues are the nation’s fastest growing type of litigation. One said that “multi-plaintiff wage and hour lawsuits pose the greatest employment litigation threat to American businesses today.”

The Wage and Hour Division is responsible for enforcing some of the nation’s most comprehensive federal labor laws regarding minimum wage, overtime pay, record keeping, youth employment, special employment, family and medical leave, migrant workers, lie detector tests, worker protections in certain temporary worker programs, and the prevailing wages for government service and construction contractors.

Take Proactive Measures Now

The Department of Labor’s ‘We Can Help’ campaign highlights the importance of taking a proactive stance and meeting this challenge head-on. In our next post we will review some concrete actions you can take to prepare your business.

(This guest post was authored by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D. the Director of the Equal Employment Advisory and Litigation Support (EEA/LS) Division of Minimax Consulting. Her division specializes in the application of economics and statistic to employment decisions and employment related issues. Stephanie can be reached at http://www.theproactiveemployer.com.)