Posts Tagged ‘PEO’

Administrative Services Outsourcing (ASO) – A Flexible HR Service Option

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Human Resources OutsourcingOur last post discussed the concept of “Co-employment” and the role of a Professional Employer Organization. Today we will look at an alternative to co-employment – the ASO.

Administrative Services Outsourcing (ASO)

There has been a growing interest in offering non-PEO services in recent years. Known as ASO (Administrative Services Outsourcing), this service model offers clients a full range of human resources consulting, insurance administration and payroll services, without requiring the establishment of a co-employment relationship. An ASO relationship is also more commonly known as Human Resources Outsourcing.

Our firm began offering ASO services approximately five years ago, after our sales force experienced challenges to selling co-employment. In some cases, the reasons were tangible concerns, such as a risky blue collar operation with bad losses which was declined workers’ coverage through the PEO, or a small employer with minimum-wage employees that did not meet our minimum contribution levels for health insurance, or a long-term broker relationship which dashed the sales process.

In other cases, the objections were less tangible, but just as real. Prospects could not completely grasp the co-employment concept, felt they would be losing control over their employees, or simply looked at the PEO industry with suspicion. Insurance agents, fearful of losing a commission, didn’t help the sale either.

Recognizing the value proposition a PEO offers to small business, but fearful that the co-employment requirements could hinder sales, we adopted a more flexible, customized approach to selling human resource services. The philosophy was simple – if we already had the in-house experts available to provide a valuable service to a business, why should we force the PEO box – and possibly lose a deal – if the co-employment relationship did not work for a particular prospect?

Full service HR in a flexible environment

In an ASO relationship, clients can either maintain their existing benefits and workers’ compensation insurance plans, or the PEO shops their insurances on the open market. The win-win is obvious – clients maintain control of their own plans, and other concerns about co-employment can be avoided. At the same time, they still gain access to virtually all the PEO’s services. For the PEO, it can charge administration fees commensurate with the services provided, and maintain broader “golden handcuffs”.

The multi-service approach offers the PEO sales staff greater flexibility when consulting and packaging HR outsourcing services. It also promotes a more customer-centric sales approach, as the sales consultant can walk into a first sales call with no preconceived end-game or one-size-fits-all philosophy.

Particularly in today’s volatile economy, many small employers are hesitant to engage in complex, long-term financial arrangements. By its very nature, co-employment is a more involved relationship that is hard to enter, and even more difficult to break. The current economic climate is another reason ASO may be considered a more attractive option for a businesses looking for HR support.

Keep your HR options open

If you are considering using an outside service to assist you with your Human Resources management, take some time to investigate the benefits of both ASO and co-employment. Chances are, one of them will work for your organization, and  you’ll be on your way to simplifying your business operations, reducing your HR risks, and cutting employment overhead.

Co-Employment vs. ASO – Which HR Outsourcing Arrangement Makes Sense for Your Business?

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

HR OutsourcingIn the Professional Employer Organization (PEO) industry, there are typically two types of arrangements – Co-Employment, and ASO (Administrative Services Only). Both assist small and mid-size employers with their human resources tasks and responsibilities, but approach the relationship from two very different directions. Our next few posts will discuss the difference between these service-models and which one may make more sense for your business.

Co-Employment

Co-Employment is the relationship created between a PEO and its clients, wherein the PEO assists its clients in reducing the risks and responsibilities of being an employer. Co-Employment is defined as the contractual allocation and sharing of employer responsibilities between the PEO and the client. The PEO assumes the role of the Administrative Employer and is recognized as the legal Employer-of-Record. The PEO takes on numerous administrative, and strategic, functions for their clients. These functions include:

  • Paying the Employees and Filing Payroll Taxes
  • Issuing Workers’ Compensation Insurance Coverage
  • Providing Employee Health Insurance Coverages
  • Training Management and Staff
  • Implementing Risk Management and Safety Plans
  • Providing Employment Consulting and Compliance
  • Managing Administrative Human Resource Functions

The client maintains the role as the Administrative Employer and continues to manage and oversee all day-to-day activities relating to their internal operations. They provide worksite employees with the tools, instruments and place to work, and continue to oversee the hiring, firing, establishment of wages, and direction of the workforce. The PEO assists in ensuring that worksite employees are provided with a worksite that is safe, conducive to productivity, and operated in compliance with employment laws and regulations. In addition, the PEO provides worksite employees with workers’ compensation insurance, unemployment insurance, and a broad range of employee benefits programs.

Removing Distractions and Reducing Overhead

By providing these services, PEOs enable their clients to concentrate on their core business without the challenges and distractions associated with the “business of employment.” As a result, PEOs enhance the profitability of their client companies. The PEO’s economies-of-scale enables each client company to lower employment costs and increase the business’s bottom line. The client can maintain a simple in-house HR infrastructure or none at all by relying on the PEO. The client also can reduce hiring overhead. Costs related to the monitoring of, and compliance with, employment laws are reduced, as are the often significant costs of failure to comply with such laws. In addition, the PEO provides time savings by handling routine and redundant tasks for its clients. This enables the business owner to focus on the company’s core competency and grow its bottom line.

In our next post, we will discuss an alternative to co-employment, known as “ASO” – Administrative Services Only. Most of the same services, without creating a co-employment relationship.

Case Study, Part II – Medical Practice Reduces Risk Through HRO

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Our last post introduced a growing medical practice with their share of Human Resource challenges. In this second and final post, we ‘ll look at the HR solutions offered by CPEhr and the concrete results they experienced.

HR Solutions

Upon entering the HR Outsourcing relationship with the practice, a CPEhr Human Resources Specialist immediately began to review their policies and employee documentation. Many gaps in employment protocol were identified. An array of new employment forms were created, compliant procedures were implemented and new guidelines were put into practice. The Director and Office Manager received training on proper employee review and termination procedures, and their designated HR Specialist was invited to attend exit interviews and assist in the termination process.

“I have run the office for more than a decade,” says the Director, “But knowing CPEhr is here to guide me through all employee matter offers tremendous peace of mind. Now, instead of being distracted by minor personnel issues, I can focus on the practice. CPEhr has truly become our partner.”

The most critical assistance occurred when the practice decided to outsource their billing function and to layoff the entire department. CPEhr assigned several HR staff to assist in the layoffs, with proper termination procedures, protocol and severance packages that were in the best interest of both the practice and the employees. The Director sums up the incident succinctly: “We could never have done this on our own.”

Real Results

Since joining CPEhr, he feels that the day-to-day protection he experiences in the area of employment exposures is immeasurable. “I now have tremendous peace of mind. CPEhr has become our ‘go-to resource.’ Without this type of relationship we end up making our own decisions, without proper knowledge of the law, and will ultimately make a mistake. You think you can use common sense, but common sense and the law rarely match!”

The Director says the benefits of CPEhr were immediately realized, as the new systems and processes were implemented and functioning within 30-60 days. “I recognize the reality that as the practice grows. So too would the need to hire an HR Manager. However, by outsourcing to CPEhr , we don’t need to spend the money on another hire and can use those funds to invest back into patient care and clinical research.”

Employee Training and Development – a Business Must-Have to Survive in 2010.

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Even now, in difficult economic times, while employers continue to look for ways to keep costs down and reduce overhead, owners and entrepreneurs see value in employee and management training. Employers realize that educational development and training is a crucial investment for a motivated workforce. An intelligent, well-trained workforce is central to worker productivity and key to a company’s success.

Surveys support the need for management training.

Ken Blanchard Companies recently conducted a poll of over 1,700 executives and managers in their “2009 Corporate Issues Survey”. In the survey, the executives were posed the question, amongst others: “What tactics will your firm implement to cope in a down economy?” The overwhelming response by close to 2/3 of respondents was “Invest in productivity and performance maximizing strategies”.  These businesses recognize that the most promising way to weather tough economic times is to have skilled talent help grow the organization. Additionally, numerous surveys directly link employee training with lower turnover, lower accidents, and increased performance and productivity. Successful companies embrace training as a central part of their philosophy.

Outsourcing training to a Professional Employer Organization

According to the American Society of Training and Development (ASTD) over $134 billion was spent on employee learning and development in 2008. In their 2009 State of the Industry Report, the ASTD reveals that over $45 billion was allocated to external services such as workshops, vendors and external events. Businesses recognize the value of accessing external resources to train and develop their staff, as opposed to creating and implementing these programs internally.

A Professional Employer Organization offers a wide range of employee training and management development courses, often built into their standard services, or for an additional nominal fee. This training goes  hand-in-hand with additional Human Resources support services, to round out a company’s corporate policies to ensure a safe, compliant, and positive work environment.

Robust Course Offering

PEOs offer a complete range of training, but the most common ones appear below. CPEhr provides over 40 customizable trainings that can be delivered via the internet, or live, on-site at the client’s workplace.

Courses typically offered can include:

•    Sexual Harassment    •    Workplace Safety   •    FMLA    •    Interviewing Skills   •    Progressive Steps of Discipline    •    Motivating Employees   •    Performance Appraisals    •    Effective Communication Skills   •    Principles of Time Management    •    Diversity in the Workplace   •    Preventing and Defusing Violence    •    Customer Service Training   •    Effective Business Writing    •    Managing Difficult Employees

FREE Webinar on the Value of Training

If you like to learn more about the benefits of training for your organization, please join on THIS THURSDAY, January 21, 2010 for a free webinar: The Business Value of Training. Register here.

PEOs Help Streamline Operations and Simplify Complex HR Administration

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

We continue our discussion on how Human Resources Outsourcing firms and Professional Employer Organizations can significantly reduce the labor costs for small and mid-sized employers. Last post discussed the concept of economies-of-scale. Today we will look at how PEOs can streamline the HR processes within an organization, and reduce redundant employment administration.

Streamlining Operations.

PEOs can help small employers stabilize operating costs is through streamlining their internal administrative operations. By joining a PEO, businesses are able to combine multiple vendors under one roof, thereby eliminating the need to maintain relationships with multiple vendors.

A full-service PEO can provide all of the following services, often at a reduced cost:

  1. Payroll processing
  2. Tax services
  3. Governmental form submissions
  4. Safety consulting
  5. Assistance with labor law compliance
  6. Creating and reviewing employee handbooks & policies
  7. Health insurance plans & administration
  8. 401 (k) and Cafeteria 125 Plans
  9. Workers’ Compensation insurance
  10. Management Training
  11. Recruiting services
  12. Assistance with unemployment administration

Eliminate Multiple “Point People”
From the personnel and management perspective, these services result in a reduction of duplicated efforts between departments and enables them focus their time on core business functions. Often, only one “point person” is required within the client’s organization, replacing multiple positions in multiple departments.

Some companies experience such a drastic reduction in administrative functions they are able to reduce headcount. Others find more valuable, revenue-generating tasks for these employees to fill. The most successful companies will be those that focus on the core business rather than spend money and use staff resources to manage non-revenue generating tasks, such as benefits and retirement plans administration, managing HR compliance regulations, or processing payroll and taxes.

From the business-owners’ perspective, reports indicate that once HR and other operations are outsourced, employers are better positioned to focus on their core operations.