Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The Importance of Employee Documentation: Part I

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

A wide range of state and federal laws require employers to maintain employee records for specified periods of time. The gamut of federal laws extends from the Fair Labor Standards Act to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. In addition to official records pertaining to matters such as wage and hour information, I-9 forms and employee payrolls, documentation concerning employee performance and communication with customers or suppliers are also essential, providing legal evidence in case of necessity.

Events that are not recorded will be regarded as non-events, as if they never occurred. Many employers do not realize that documentation is a necessity. Those that do grasp its importance do not always devote sufficient time towards maintaining documentation that will be adequate to defend themselves, should the need arise. Employers may find themselves in court, ardently stating that they spoke with their employee on several occasions, without any evidence to support their assertion. Time and effort devoted to proper documentation is a wise investment for any employer.

The Value of Documentation

Documentation provides protection to both companies and employees by presenting concrete evidence of data, facts and actions in the case of investigation, arbitration or litigation. Documentation provides proof that decisions concerning an employee’s status were entirely based on job performance and other related issues. Conversely, documentation protects employees from false claims maintained by managers or supervisors not performing their job properly.

What is documentation?

Documentation is the formal reporting of facts, incidents, evaluations and observations of any specific situation or communication. The most common form of documentation is the written word, but it may include videotapes, audio recordings and the like. Barring a specific request for an employee’s signature such as upon receipt of a handbook, training or possibly a disciplinary warning, documentation does not generally require an employee’s signature.

When to Document

Managers should ensure that they document as soon as feasibly possible following actual events. Studies indicate that as quickly as 15 minutes after an event occurs, a person’s memory begins to fade or change. Prompt documentation will be considered more credible and reliable.

Elements of Documentation

Documentation should include the full names and titles of the involved parties, the date the event occurred as well as the document writing date. Record the type of event observed or the violation witnessed, including specific details and photocopies of any evidence.

Objective and Specific

Be specific when recording your documentation, but remain completely objective, making sure to stick to the facts. Avoid stating “opinions” and steer clear of exaggerations. “Joe appeared to be deceiving me” would be considered an opinion lacking supportive evidence, whereas, “Joe avoided all eye contact during the meeting” is an objective behavioral observation.

In our next post, Employee Documentation: What to Do and What to Avoid, we will specify the circumstances which require documentation and identify common documentation errors worth avoiding.

CPEhr Announces Strategic Partnership With Morgan Stanely Smith Barney

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

The CPEhr Multiple Employer 401(k) Plan continues to experience substantial growth in assets and participants in spite of a volatile market.  For the past nine years, Transamerica has been an excellent partner ensuring that CPEhr meets all its fiduciary responsibilities as Plan Sponsor.  To further enhance plan administration, CPEhr is pleased to announce the addition of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney as a strategic partner.

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is recognized as a global leader in wealth management services.  This new partnership provides CPEhr and its clients access to a wide range of products and services including investment advisory services, financial and wealth planning, credit and lending, cash management, annuities and insurance and retirement and trust services.

“One key element of the partnership is Morgan Stanley Smith Barney’s unique expertise and experience in corporate retirement/401k plans as well as managing personal wealth management,” says Harry Ogan, CPEhr’s Retirement Plan Analyst.  “As advisors to our retirement plans, they will work to ensure that we continue to offer the most comprehensive, cost effective solutions available to our clients and their employees.”

As fiduciary advisors, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney will lend its expertise to make certain that CPEhr’s plans remain competitive and provide employees the best investment options.

Furthermore, CPEhr’s clients and their employees now have access to a team of professional financial advisors to help them navigate through these difficult markets and advise with 401k investments to enhance the overall financial and retirement planning experience.  Employees can also obtain guidance with 401k plans from previous employers as well as other outside investments.   They will have full access to all of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney’s products and services.

For more information, please contact Harry Ogan, CPEhr’s Retirement Plan Analyst at (310) 270-9839.

The Five Characteristics of Difficult Employees

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

Everyone suffers when there is a difficult employee in the workplace.  An astute manager can recognize difficult employees, determine whether their behavior can be changed and whether or not they should be terminated.  

How to recognize a difficult employee.

A manager must be able to recognize the behavior of a difficult employee. Difficult employees have a damaging effect on the workplace when they put a negative spin on decisions, undermine authority, create hostile work relationships, damage group moral and so much more.  A difficult employee will also spread rumors, refuse to cooperate, break the rules, avoid work, be frequently late, complain constantly and display anger.

A manager must first determine if the difficult employee has a performance problem caused by issues outside of work such as abuse, physical abuse, substance abuse, financial, family or personal health, and/or emotional.  In these cases, a manager may want to encourage the employee to consider outside help.

The Five Types of Difficult Employees

It must be decided if the difficult employee has a personality or behavior problem in order to decide on a course of action.  There are five personality types: The Bully, The Procrastinator, The Passive Aggressive and The Gossip and The Constant Critic.

  1. The Bully. Personality traits for the Bully may include physical and verbal intimidation, shouting, profanity, throwing objects, blaming others and threats.  This behavior is often caused by low self-esteem and from seeking control. In order to deal with a bully, a manager should be firm; use open-ended questions; not compete, take notes, and require their cooperation to sit down and talk. If there are frequent outbursts,  it is critical to address the issues immediately to ensure a safe workplace.
  2. The Procrastinator has trouble starting/completing tasks and lacks motivation. This is caused by a fear of humiliation, rejection, and failure.  It helps to set procrastinators up on a specific timetable, with required “mini” updates. Also, a manager must be prepared to re-assign the project to someone else.
  3. The Passive Aggressive is friendly to your face and negative behind your back.  Not a team player, they agree with everything but end up doing what they want.  The passive aggressive is angry but dislikes confrontation.  The manager should be specific; concrete in expectations; clear about consequences; and try not to over supervise this type.
  4. The Gossip talks to everyone about anything due to an extreme need to be liked and accepted. The manager should never participate in gossip and immediately identify it while using disciplinary action if necessary.
  5. The Constant Critic falsely accuses and undermines others behind closed doors, including the boss and company decisions.  This type also humiliates others in public settings in order to control the emotional climate at work. 

How to determine if the behavior of a difficult employee can change.

Meeting with the employee will determine if their behavior can be changed. First, a manager must be calm, consistent in communication, and courteous.  Before the meeting, objectively define the issue, decide the ideal outcome and write a scriptThe script should be designed to keep the employee open to conversation and ask for their assistance.  Start with a goal, which should be aligned with the goals of the individual, the department and the company.  One should be specific in defining expectations.  Be clear on both the manager’s role and the employee’s role. Identify the issue and possible causes; clarify workplace policies, and ultimately seek a solution from the employee.   Create a time frame for how long the solution should take.   At the end of the meeting, recap the conversation and confirm agreed upon solutions.  Be sure to document the conversation and use progressive discipline if appropriate.

Should the Employee be terminated?

First, determine if the workplace is creating “difficult employees.”  For example, the following workplace issues can create difficult employees:

  • when a manager prefers to avoid conflict;
  • has discomfort being a disciplinarian;
  • employee’s strength mask the weaknesses or “snows” the manager and coworkers;
  • personal friendship between the manager and the employee.

If the workplace is not to blame and the behavior of an individual becomes excessive such as going beyond the company’s policies and procedures and interfering with productivity and/or safety of themselves or others, it may be time to terminate.  This must be carefully considered since terminations affect credibility and morale, turnover costs are high, and unlawful termination claims should be avoided at all costs.

CPEhr Declared One of Los Angeles’ “Best Places to Work” for the Third Consecutive Year

Wednesday, August 10th, 2011

CPEhr, a Human Resources Outsourcing firm, is three for three, once again credited as one of the ‘Best Places to Work in Los Angeles’ by the LA Business Journal.  This revered honor is bestowed on elite employers who have proven that they know what it takes to create an environment where people love to come to work.

The program was open to all public and privately held companies working in Los Angeles County.  The assessment involved a confidential Employee Engagement and Satisfaction Survey which was used to evaluate the workplace experience and company culture.

Harold Walt, CPEhr’s CEO, states, “I genuinely believe in our people and we will do everything that we can to ensure success by promoting an environment that celebrates diversity, collaboration and achievement.  We know that by empowering the right people with talent, dedication and extraordinary can-do attitudes, we will always come out on top.”

CPEhr offers a wide range of benefits and programs to its employees in an effort to promote a positive and productive work and life balance.  Many of the benefit offerings are also available to the organizations to which CPEhr provides Human Resources services.  Corporate employees enjoy activities such as the CPEhr Olympics, a softball team, annual fitness challenges, weekly yoga classes, and monthly employee celebrations for birthdays, anniversaries, personal milestones and achievements.

“We feel very privileged to be recognized alongside such wonderful and innovative Los Angeles employers,” says Faith Branvold, CPE hr’s President.  “I am motivated and inspired each and every day by the team of professionals that I have the opportunity to work with in providing outstanding value to the cherished clients we serve.”

The Differences Between Federal and California Labor Laws

Monday, May 16th, 2011

Most employers recognize that there are both federal and state laws that regulate how business is conducted.  What many do not realize is how these state and federal approaches may vary. Employers in the state need to recognize that labor law in California differs from federal guidelines in many areas of employment legislation.

Which law to follow?

As a general guideline, the law (federal or state) which provides greater protection to the individual employee will take precedent.  Other times, state law dramatically broadens the base of employees that qualify for protection.

Employer Responsibility

There is a significant difference in attitude between the federal approach and the state approach regarding the extent to which an employer is responsible to comply with the law. The federal government, through various Supreme Court cases (Faragher v City of Boca Raton, for example), strongly ENCOURAGE employers to train and educate their employees regarding the laws of harassment and discrimination.  Punitive damages may be reduced or eliminated in circumstances where businesses were able to provide “proactive” evidence of intent to comply and provide a safe and harassment free environment. However, this training is not mandatory.

In contrast, California (along with Maine and Connecticut), REQUIRES private sector employers to provide unlawful harassment training to all managers of businesses with 50 or more employees.   California takes the law a step further by requiring this training to be provided again every two years with very specific rules regarding documentation and tracking.

Discrimination Protections

Perhaps one of the most striking differences can be found in the area of discrimination protections. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act, otherwise known as FEHA, is the primary California law that prohibits employment discrimination against employees.  Through the federal laws, such as the Civil Rights Act, Title VII and additional amendments and laws (ADEA, ADA, USERRA, Civil Rights Act of 1991 for example) all employees nationally are protected from discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender (sex) and national origin/ancestry, age, medical conditions, mental and physical disabilities, military service, marital status, pregnancy and related medical conditions.

California also has addressed these issues through FEHA which protects from discrimination by all businesses supporting the federal protected categories. FEHA adds sexual orientation and transgenderism as additional protected categories.

Defined by the number of employees

In order for an employer to be covered by the federal laws, they must have 15 or more employees. For ADEA, the employer has to have 20 or more employees. What that means is that an employer with 14 or fewer employees would be not be subjected to these federal laws.

In contrast, FEHA states that harassment applies to all employers in the state regardless of the number of employees.  In addition, FEHA states that all employers in California with 5 or more employees must comply with the gender discrimination laws including sexual harassment, gender harassment and harassment based on pregnancy and associated medical conditions.

A Recent California FEHA Lawsuit

The complexity of FEHA is underscored by a recent judgment issued by the California Court of Appeals in the case, Wills v. Superior Court of Orange County. In this case, Linda Wills was an employee of the Orange County Superior Court. She was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder, but did not disclose this to her employer. After acting aggressively and violently against fellow employees she was let go, and subsequently sued the court for unlawful discrimination. Following an extended trial and appeal, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the employer, stating that despite her disability, her threats of violence and unacceptable behavior violated company policy. For more details, read the complete report here.

In summary, it is critical for employers to recognize their employment obligations, and potential liabilities, under both federal and state laws. It is highly recommended to engage the services of an employment law professional in your state of operations to provide the proper guidance and direction in all areas of employment compliance.

Disclaimer

Just Released: “Human Resources Outsourcing – 7 Client Success Stories”

Monday, May 9th, 2011

In almost every organization, it is the employees that drive their success. From growth and product development, to customer service and quality assurance, it is the people who will ultimately have the greatest impact on the company’s future profitability and stability. A key to business success in today’s environment will be concentrating on improving the human resources systems within the organization: developing and motivating their employees, protecting their companies against employment lawsuits, and researching more efficient and cost effective HR systems.

The obstacles faced by many businesses in achieving these goals are the limitation of time, resources, and manpower to effectively improve their HR infrastructure. The level of expertise and know-how required to impact the HR systems is usually beyond their means. More often than not, these critical areas are left by the wayside as other tasks dominate management’s time and energy.

The HR Outsourcing Solution

A solution that has been growing in popularity over the past decade has been to bypass the conflict completely, by outsourcing the complex, time consuming, or unproductive tasks relating to employee administration. The Human Resources Outsourcing industry has continued to grow in recent years, despite the global recession.

Human Resources Outsourcing can take on many appearances, from complete end-to-end processes, to specific, discreet functions. But in the end, they all share the same principle: by entrusting non-core, non-revenue generating tasks to an outside expert or firm, the business can comfortably focus on other critical areas, assured their human resources systems will be managed professionally and efficiently.

**Just Released** – 7 Client Success Stories

Over the past 3 decades, CPEhr has successfully helped small employers throughout the state of California, and across the nation, manage their employee administration more efficiently, and cost effectively. We encourage you to read seven real-life stories of businesses that were ready to think out-of-the-box and utilize HR Outsourcing in their company.

Download your free copy of:

HR Outsoucing: 7 Business Success Stories